From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Nov 2 13:54:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAAE37B401 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:54:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from cheer.mahoroba.org (flets20-045.kamome.or.jp [218.45.20.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F035143E6E for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:54:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from lyrics.mahoroba.org (IDENT:V7OTzjB81Zqum/ihg/FTVz4bkvU+/kO0SttZaOevrv9ZRq1lo5jiSi/opoz68119@lyrics.mahoroba.org [IPv6:2001:200:301:0:280:88ff:fe03:4841]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0) by cheer.mahoroba.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP/inet6 id gA2Ls1Kv054121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Nov 2002 06:54:05 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 06:54:00 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: elitetek@tekrealm.net Cc: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipv6 patch ( Was: ipv6 breakage or me? ) In-Reply-To: <20021102202238.GA66480@freebsd.tekrealm.net> References: <20021102202238.GA66480@freebsd.tekrealm.net> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.9.15 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi) FLIM/1.14.4 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Kashiharajing=FE-mae?=) APEL/10.4 Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, >>>>> On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:22:38 -0800 >>>>> Andrew Stuart said: elitetek> The patch you were talking about, was that ever applied? elitetek> I have been fighting with 2 boxes that after going to 4.7 lost ipv6 elitetek> support, i am using the freenet6 client, tspc, it seems to connect elitetek> and do everything its suppost to, but commands like ping6 dont seem elitetek> to get out. I am not sure if this is related to what you guys were elitetek> talking about.. anyways both boxes have been rebuilt oct-13 or later.. The behavior that gif was mistakenly up by tunnel creation (SIOCSIFPHYADDR) was fixed in 4.7-RELEASE. So, you need to do up gif interface explicitly. freebsd44.sh of tscp doesn't do this. Please try following patch: Index: freenet6-0.9.6/template/freebsd44.sh diff -u freenet6-0.9.6/template/freebsd44.sh.orig freenet6-0.9.6/template/freebsd44.sh --- freenet6-0.9.6/template/freebsd44.sh.orig Sun Nov 3 06:31:28 2002 +++ freenet6-0.9.6/template/freebsd44.sh Sun Nov 3 06:31:50 2002 @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ fi Exec $ifconfig $TSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE create Exec $gifconfig $TSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE $TSP_CLIENT_ADDRESS_IPV4 $TSP_SERVER_ADDRESS_IPV4 + Exec $ifconfig $TSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE up # # Configured tunnel config (IPv6) freebsd44.sh seems to assing address. So, essentially, it should be okay wishout above patch. However, unfortunately, gif has one more problem that it doesn't up by address assign (SIOCSIFADDR). This problem was fixed in 5-CURRENT, and it will be MFC'ed. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message