Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 07:37:51 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> To: Thierry Thomas <thierry@pompo.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ability for maintainers to update own ports Message-ID: <3FB1B91F.8030709@ciam.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031111202136.GA40106@graf.pompo.net> References: <1068458390.38101.19.camel@dirk.no.domain> <20031110152000.622db381.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <1068471598.38101.77.camel@dirk.no.domain> <20031110163623.GC93583@procyon.firepipe.net> <1068495958.690.72.camel@leguin> <53EC784E-13C5-11D8-AD24-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <3FB00E53.8060603@fillmore-labs.com> <20031111021929.GA17050@xor.obsecurity.org> <73E9F604-1472-11D8-BD31-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20031111202136.GA40106@graf.pompo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thierry Thomas wrote: > I agree: we don't need branching. The GNATS PR database may be used as a > kind of "untested" branch. It's already possible to search for a port > from <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?query>, to grab > the shar files or the patches, to test them, and then to report the > results of these tests. A reviewed PR might be committed faster. GNATS is not convinient for this purpose. E.g. I can't to get PR changes notification. Really I've sent some follow-ups and missed comments because of a sender forgot Cc: me. May be GNATS4 will be better if upgraded some time. --- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FB1B91F.8030709>