Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 16:19:18 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Nick Hibma <n_hibma@calcaphon.com> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADSUP: bioops patch. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006171614150.1644-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0006161236160.24007-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Nick Hibma wrote: > What about using uppercase names for > > buf_complete -> BUF_COMPLETE > > and friends to make it apparent that an indirect call is being made and Ugh. Upper case names for function-like interfaces are for ones that might be implemented as unsafe macros. > that the function might not be supported on that struct buf. Much like > newbus, kobj, and vnode ops. New interfaces like newbus and kobj shouldn't have allowed for being misimplemented as unsafe macros. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006171614150.1644-100000>