From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 25 07:58:24 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA17771 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 07:58:24 -0700 Received: from plains.nodak.edu (89@plains.NoDak.edu [134.129.111.64]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA17750 ; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 07:58:14 -0700 Received: (from tinguely@localhost) by plains.nodak.edu (8.6.11/8.6.10) id JAA09084; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:58:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:58:04 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely Message-Id: <199510251458.JAA09084@plains.nodak.edu> To: davidg@Root.COM, mikebo@tellabs.com Subject: Re: 2.1.0-951020-SNAP: Major bug in NFS again! Cc: bugs@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Content-Length: 555 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk what is the IP number of tellabk and sunk (or if this is private, what is the relationship between these two numbers is sunk IP < tellabk IP)? If I remember correctly when I was playing with IP aliases (ie "multi-homed"), on a new connection from a multi-homed FreeBSD machine, the multi-homed machine used lowest IP number whether the lowest IP was the real (ifconfig without an alias) interface address or not. I think this operation is incorrect. UDP and TCP should alway orginate the real address not the lowest (possibly and alias) address. --mark.