From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 15 21:56:55 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9172C106566B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:56:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 172-17-150-251.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0AC205037;
	Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:56:00 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F3C29F0.6080106@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:56:00 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386;
	rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120213 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marco Steinbach <coco@executive-computing.de>
References: <4F3BBB66.7070009@executive-computing.de>
In-Reply-To: <4F3BBB66.7070009@executive-computing.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portmaster: Installing new ports without upgrading already
 installed ones ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:56:55 -0000

On 02/15/2012 06:04, Marco Steinbach wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> is there a way for telling portmaster to not upgrade already installed
> dependencies, besides explicitly excluding these with '-x' or using
> '+IGNOREME' ?

Someone already mentioned -i.

> In other words:  Is there a flag, or a combination thereof, to have
> portmaster conveniently just install missing and not upgrade allready
> installed dependencies -- like a 'make install' in a ports' directory
> would do ?

To answer your question, no. The tool is not designed to be used that
way. (And no, I won't add that as an option.)


hth,

Doug

-- 

	It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/