From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep  1 14:40:23 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B8C1DB
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Sun,  1 Sep 2013 14:40:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from taguchi949@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-pb0-x232.google.com (mail-pb0-x232.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::232])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E011F2FCB
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Sun,  1 Sep 2013 14:40:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id uo5so3755977pbc.37
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 07:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=GaKMcwrYMNNPC9cFhOy0HPDEVWD0PbPzhuijdFA2JP0=;
 b=EmFTDOBian5/ESa3/TIXMDbpUNQNSi1Qg4uHVczE3Jyi+BoNqiiIC4KXwZ3oz2YQFL
 y357s5LENLRyLUv0+VE3PSwC9LExCAZWpSQYYOP0kLN0HvCM5cDD57NGoGMksyXCdm1A
 wx547JWoHAPGZxCQkL0mbwnjCU/EjPgoL8wfp4GJOQTqNiLz5py88E6Fy9hPWzOwXUPd
 y8Ank8wGRsNdg+lUQ415MrBRnKA90qfgqNVCBrZg0+bGqhFKUPOHteEHXjSN4EcGZIrv
 8w62FFD3SHchYjWNHQZ5eW6flk5AYslwtJoKyrKX7OgJowbikxGHbl6mKfQb45Or5Npv
 3oqw==
X-Received: by 10.66.25.232 with SMTP id f8mr21795437pag.25.1378046422579;
 Sun, 01 Sep 2013 07:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BL-212 (48.178.30.125.dy.iij4u.or.jp. [125.30.178.48])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tg7sm10079803pbc.36.1969.12.31.16.00.00
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Sun, 01 Sep 2013 07:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 23:40:23 +0900
From: Takeshi Taguchi <taguchi949@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What's the recipe?
Message-Id: <20130901234023.ff8c398e2c9cba515b7470ef@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1378043907.1111.351.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
References: <522229C0.5030504@m5p.com>
 <20130901200726.ac7317a5f0ddfddcbed34484@gmail.com>
 <1378043907.1111.351.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 14:40:23 -0000

Hi, Ian.

not performance issue.
it's sshd crash probrem.

sshd and some programs crash with following mesg:
<jemalloc>: jemalloc_arena.c:380: Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" 

MALLOC_PRODUCTION suppress this crash.
YES. this is NOT good way. but it's seem work fine.

Thanks.

On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 07:58:27 -0600
Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:07 +0900, Takeshi Taguchi wrote:
> > % egrep -v ^# /etc/src.conf
> > MALLOC_PRODUCTION=YES
> > 
> > i think we stil need MALLOC_PRODUCTION. because jemalloc issue
> > does not fixed yet.
> > 
> This is not correct. There is no longer a need to set MALLOC_PRODUCTION,
> the performance problem that required it was fixed months ago.  
> 
> -- Ian
> 
> 


-- 
Takeshi Taguchi <taguchi949@gmail.com>