Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:04:59 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future of RAIDFrame Message-ID: <20040111020459.5bbba56a@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <3180.1073776377@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <40007D14.6090205@freebsd.org> <3180.1073776377@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:57 +0100
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> As much as I would hate to see RF and Vinum disappar from our
> source tree, maybe what we need to do is to kick them both into
> "training-camp" in p4 while you and Greg look the other way.
[...]
> I'd say lets kick them both into perforce and let whoever wants
> their hands have a go at them.
RF isn't working today on -current, vinum is (please don't tell me
something else, I don't want the system under my desk stop running on a
vinum volume just because you say it has to :-)). Do you really want to
throw your axe at vinum while it's still alive?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
I will be available to get hired in April 2004.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040111020459.5bbba56a>