From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 22:07:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0CD1065674 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coco@executive-computing.de) Received: from mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.35.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5C38FC08 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.moehre.org (unknown [195.96.35.7]) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1848D8B141F; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:07:47 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.964 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.964 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, AWL=0.036, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mail.moehre.org ([195.96.35.7]) by mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.35.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l31nvLGG0cbY; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:07:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from s560x.c0c0.intra (p54B09E65.dip.t-dialin.net [84.176.158.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: coco@executive-computing.de) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D941F8B141D; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:07:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:07:44 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Steinbach X-X-Sender: coco@s560x.c0c0.intra To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <4F3C29F0.6080106@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <4F3BBB66.7070009@executive-computing.de> <4F3C29F0.6080106@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster: Installing new ports without upgrading already installed ones ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:07:49 -0000 On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/15/2012 06:04, Marco Steinbach wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> is there a way for telling portmaster to not upgrade already installed >> dependencies, besides explicitly excluding these with '-x' or using >> '+IGNOREME' ? > > Someone already mentioned -i. > >> In other words: Is there a flag, or a combination thereof, to have >> portmaster conveniently just install missing and not upgrade allready >> installed dependencies -- like a 'make install' in a ports' directory >> would do ? > > To answer your question, no. The tool is not designed to be used that > way. (And no, I won't add that as an option.) Fair enough -- thanks for the clarification. And for maintaining portmaster in the first place, of course. MfG CoCo