Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 07:24:35 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: kalts@estpak.ee Cc: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vallo Kallaste wrote: > He has rather unusual requirements compared to a lot of others. As I > understand he runs hundreds of jails and has thousands of processes, > putting real challenge to VM. All this means that FreeBSD > isn't ready to enterprise yet .... What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. If the concern is with stability and performance, one would track -SECURITY and not -STABLE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E68B9B3.9030509>