From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 17 02:00:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3462716A4CE for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 02:00:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943B343DB7 for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 02:00:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmc2004aug@bellsouth.net) Received: from ibm65aec.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.netESMTP <20050517020049.GHRE2059.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm65aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 22:00:49 -0400 Received: from wcox.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by ibm65aec.bellsouth.netESMTP <20050517020049.HGLO26760.ibm65aec.bellsouth.net@wcox.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 22:00:49 -0400 Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20050516215636.02a1c380@mailsvr.xxiii.com> X-Sender: wmc_sr20@mail.bellsouth.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:00:56 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: wmc2004aug@bellsouth.net In-Reply-To: <20050517103300.2930.REES@ddcom.co.jp> References: <9e46c99e0505161103551224ed@mail.gmail.com> <20050517103300.2930.REES@ddcom.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: FreeBSD or NetBSD on older hardware (MMX) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 02:00:55 -0000 At 09:36 PM 5/16/2005, you wrote: >... It is a Pentium 233 MMX w/ 64MB Ram and 12G HD ... >... Which would perform better on such a system? FreeBSD or NetBSD? I have a system with nearly identical specs that runs DNS and some other minor services on our external network. While I can't comment on NetBSD, I would suggest that with FreeBSD in that little memory, you should take the time to configure and compile a stripped-down kernel. It saves 5 or 6 MB of ram on mine (ie: a good chuck of 64MB!) -Wayne