Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:14:19 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: new linux infrastructure ports are committed Message-ID: <20090402101419.66294qotkt3yphpw@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <25236143@h30.sp.ipt.ru> References: <23488525@bb.ipt.ru> <20090402085240.15665qo8nwvu1fwg@webmail.leidinger.net> <25236143@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:57:52 +0400)= : > On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:52:40 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Wed, 01 Apr 2009 =20 >> 19:34:42 +0400): > >> > The above mentioned infrasrtucture allows using different linux >> > base ports and non-base infrastructure ports. Users should define >> > at their /etc/make.conf two variables: OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT >> > and OVERRIDE_LINUX_NON_BASE_PORTS. The valid value for the latter >> > is "f8". > >> Why do we distinguish between BASE_PORT and NON_BASE_PORTS? > > We distingush them now and I'd rather keep this useful feature. I fail to understand in which case this is useful? AFAIK we can not =20 use a base of fc4 with non-base of f8 and for the other way around I =20 assume the same (if not: I don't see a point in using fc4 infra on f8 =20 base, where do you see a benefit for it?). Bye, Alexander. --=20 Lisp Users: Due to the holiday next Monday, there will be no garbage collection. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090402101419.66294qotkt3yphpw>