From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 10:09:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8E116A4D3 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:09:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz [66.92.171.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA6243D1F for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:09:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz) Received: by mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Postfix, from userid 80) id DCB101F6; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:13:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from 141.156.69.109 ([141.156.69.109]) by www.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:13:19 -0500 Message-ID: <20040209131319.2o0wkwgcsswgg8oc@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:13:19 -0500 From: Kenneth Culver To: Charles Swiger References: <20040209121420.G13061@ganymede.hub.org> <59D53984-5B26-11D8-8AE0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <59D53984-5B26-11D8-8AE0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD vs Intel ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:09:22 -0000 Quoting Charles Swiger : > On Feb 9, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> G'day all ... >> >> Simple question, I would hope ... I want to spec out a new server, and >> want to compare AMD vs Intel ... is there anything online that gives >> approx equivalents? ie. a Xeon 2.4Ghz processor would be approx >> equivalent to an AMD ... ?? > > I know you're not a troll, Marc, but this question is much like asking > whether emacs or vi makes a better editor. :-) An Intel Xeon 2.4GHz > CPU approximately resembles an AMD 2400MP CPU in terms of capabilities > and performance. By this I mean they get very similar scores from > www.spec.org's spec2000int: > > Epox 8KHA+, AMD Athlon XP 2400+: 782 > Dell PowerEdge 2650 (2.4 GHz Xeon): 792 > > ...although the spec2000fp numbers are 641 vs. 726, so the Xeon does > better at floating point. For that particular test, anyway. Do you > require SMP capabilities? What are you trying to do with this machine? > If I remember correctly though, the fp numbers are for SSE on the Xeon, and not the regular old FPU, p4 based machines are horrible when it comes to non-SSE/SSE2 type stuff. Ken