From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 25 16:17:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BEC16A420; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:17:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BDD43D46; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:17:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1PGHPv0025115; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:17:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <44008314.8030205@samsco.org> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:17:24 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051230 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yar Tikhiy References: <20060225140509.GC79616@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <20060225140509.GC79616@comp.chem.msu.su> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: current@freebsd.org, cokane@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:17:38 -0000 Yar Tikhiy wrote: > Hi there, > > In the course of reviewing and cleaning up the default configuration > of kernel options, it was suggested by the Release Engineers that > we had a separate module for TDFX_LINUX instead of placing the > burden on the device tdfx and module 3dfx. Could anybody interested > test this change? I've made sure it builds, but I have no 3dfx hw > to really test it. The testing is as simple as building the new > 3dfx and 3dfx_linux modules, loading them, and verifying that the > linux apps work with the device as before. Thanks in advance! > Why keep the TDFX_LINUX option defined in sys/conf/options? Scott