From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 26 16:56:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA01568 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 16:56:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from citytel1.citytel.net (root@citytel1.citytel.net [204.244.99.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA01560 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 16:56:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kwoody@citytel.net) Received: from mybsd.net (citytelprct48.citytel.net [204.244.99.124]) by citytel1.citytel.net (8.8.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA16893 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 17:05:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 16:26:06 -0800 (PST) From: Kwoody X-Sender: kwoody@mybsd.net To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Kernel Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Made my own kernel and it works! Just a quick question though, now that I have a kernel specific for my machine it seems as though things are running a tad quicker. Could this be possible now with way less stuff in the kernel? It is 400k smaller. It was 1.2 meg now its a wee bit over 800k. I know the reboot took way less time than it used to now that it only searches for a few things. Even the probe for my HD's only takes 3 or 4 seconds now and it used to be at least 10 seconds. Thanks! Keith.