From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Aug 15 17:39:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA10073 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 17:39:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.my.domain (ppp1718.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.249.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA10068 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 17:39:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA02242; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 20:38:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: tim owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 20:38:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: tim@localhost Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org To: "Stephen J. Roznowski" cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of p5- module work in the ports tree? In-Reply-To: <199808152251.SAA02270@istari.home.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 15 Aug 1998, Stephen J. Roznowski wrote: > I've send-pr(ed) two of them, and am willing to do the rest that > need fixing [to build html2ps, not the entire ports tree] if that > will help the effort. Don't forget to fix the PLIST. Your patch to p5-MD5 didn't so it would still be broken for perl-5.00502. > If someone is working on this, I'll just fix my local tree and wait > for the changes... Test (duh :-), and submit as one big PR. That's more likely to catch someone's attention. -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message