From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:51:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E38316A46B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:51:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2B313C48A for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54IosRT052338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:50:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <46645F0D.7020904@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:50:53 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <20070604181604.GB28548@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070604181604.GB28548@rot13.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:51:01 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > This comparison is 100% bogus. > > 4.11 and 6.2 are vastly different (the latter builds all sorts of > different code, and uses a *different compiler* that is slower in > compiling the code). When trying to compare something, you have to > compare the *same* thing, or it's meaningless. > I figured it had to be something like that. For the record, I wasn't complaining, merely curious... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/