Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:06:09 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heads Up: shutdown keyword added to 34 rc.d scripts. Message-ID: <487E54B1.4070407@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <487E533F.7050303@FreeBSD.org> References: <487E533F.7050303@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
One more followup, des had asked to have "faststop" in rc.shutdown
changed to just "stop," and initially I had no objection to that
change. However looking at it more closely, the only difference is this:
if [ -z "$rc_pid" ]; then
[ -n "$rc_fast" ] && return 0
_run_rc_notrunning
return 1
fi
The _run_rc_notrunning function is what prints the "${name} not
running?" message, which I don't think it would be useful to do when
shutting the system down.
Doug
Doug Barton wrote:
> FYI. If you are familiar with kerberos stuff and want to add shutdown
> there, please feel free. Same goes with the network stuff if you feel
> strongly it should be added.
>
> By the same token, if adding shutdown breaks something please feel
> free to revert it. The only thing I ask is that you clarify the
> reasons in the commit message for posterity.
>
> I've run with this locally for quite a while and just haven't had a
> chance to commit it. OTOH I don't use most of the stuff covered by
> this, so I'd like to get it tested in real world conditions for a
> while before it's MFC'ed.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Doug
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: svn commit: r180564 - head/etc/rc.d
> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:50:29 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
> To: src-committers@freebsd.org
>
> Author: dougb
> Date: Wed Jul 16 19:50:29 2008
> New Revision: 180564
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/180564
>
> Log:
> ~ Add the shutdown KEYWORD to those scripts that start persistent
> ~ services to allow them to do a "clean" shutdown.
>
> ~ I purposely avoided making changes to network-related stuff since
> ~ the system shutting down is pretty conclusive, and there may be
> ~ complicated dependencies on the network that I would rather not try
> ~ to unravel.
>
> ~ I also skipped kerberos-related stuff for the reasons above, and
> ~ because I have no way to test it.
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?487E54B1.4070407>