From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 14 14:50:09 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C038516A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:50:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914B043D55
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:50:09 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2EEo9Nm022339
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:50:09 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j2EEo9kP022337;
	Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:50:09 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:50:09 GMT
Message-Id: <200503141450.j2EEo9kP022337@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Jonatan B <onatan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ports/78774: Update net/libdnet 1.9 -> 1.10
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Jonatan B <onatan@gmail.com>
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:50:09 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/78774; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jonatan B <onatan@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org,
	Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Cc: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports/78774: Update net/libdnet 1.9 -> 1.10
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:47:25 +0200

 On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:41:08 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
 <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> wrote:
 > This kind of smartness is not a good idea in general, because it does not
 > translate to binary packages. It's especially unsuitable for
 > language-bindings - if at some point another port needs libdnet's
 > python-bindings, it will have no way of depending on them. Consider creating
 > a slave-port for the python-bindings instead.
 
 Are you sure? IMO it seems hardly justified, because it will create
 too many flavour-ports. Will changing it to rely only on WITH_PYTHON
 (or WITHOUT_.., I don't care) be enough?
 If you feel strongly about it, though, then I have no problem with
 splitting this port.