From owner-freebsd-testing@freebsd.org  Thu Jul  2 16:23:38 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BF89936D8
 for <freebsd-testing@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  2 Jul 2015 16:23:38 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A2421BA2
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Jul 2015 16:23:38 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t62GNbJ5030381
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:23:37 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
Subject: [Bug 201286]
 tools/regression/security/open_to_operation/open_to_operation.c:172: bad if
 test ?
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:23:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: tests
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314@hotmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
 op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-201286-32464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD <freebsd-testing.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-testing/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:23:38 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201286

            Bug ID: 201286
           Summary: tools/regression/security/open_to_operation/open_to_op
                    eration.c:172: bad if test ?
           Product: Base System
           Version: 10.1-RELEASE
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: tests
          Assignee: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
          Reporter: dcb314@hotmail.com

tools/regression/security/open_to_operation/open_to_operation.c:172]: (style)
Same expression on both sides of '=='.

       if (expected_errno && expected_errno == expected_errno)
            ok_mode(testname, NULL, mode);
        else if (expected_errno)

Even if the pointless comparison is removed, then the first
if and the second if are the same, so that needs rework too.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.