From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 19 17:29:55 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2103837B409
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 17:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web13503.mail.yahoo.com (web13503.mail.yahoo.com
	[216.136.175.82])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B4B543FDD
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 17:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dyeske@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20030420002953.55575.qmail@web13503.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [68.114.29.78] by web13503.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Sat, 19 Apr 2003 17:29:53 PDT
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 17:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com>
To: ports@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: marcus@freebsd.org
Subject: use_gnomeng
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 00:29:55 -0000

Should gnomeng be removed from existing ports?  Should gnomeng not be used for new ports?  Does
this depend on the gnome components used?  How about a port that just uses gtk12?  If the gnomeng
removal plan has been posted somewhere I have not read it and would appreciate the url...

Regards,
David Yeske

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com