Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:59:23 -0800 (PST)
From:      "f.johan.beisser" <jan@caustic.org>
To:        Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com>
Cc:        <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: IBM suing (was: RMS Suing was [SUGGESTION] - JFS for  FreeBSD)
Message-ID:  <20011214135827.F16958-100000@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20011214212150.69981.qmail@web21110.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Hiten Pandya wrote:

> There was a mention in this thread that XFS has
> dynamic inode creation.  But mein freinds, JFS also
> has dynamic inode creation capability.
>
> Thats all, :-)

just out of curiosity, is there any particular reason you prefer JFS over
XFS?

i don't recall seeing any posting on the [dis/ad]vantages of either.

-------/ f. johan beisser /--------------------------------------+
  http://caustic.org/~jan                      jan@caustic.org
    "John Ashcroft is really just the reanimated corpse
         of J. Edgar Hoover." -- Tim Triche


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011214135827.F16958-100000>