From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 15 17:37:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52B3106566C; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D268FC19; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C711E6210; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:37:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=s2d05cZbY9DU CUzzFBeRf4FDdYg=; b=ab5i0x5z9hc3rM4fFszQhV/de3x22R1O8ckoFKw6ewIX ikGhYQhut0jJ28NzOLhZRDMKN0xvQCfLdzoBQuwCtlaCRPgrukyKarPvA6/4qEAJ BebuvB6rUakNZV7ejK2S8QsLoqK2GqgdO5wRkP+Rk3eVZHOlIiZB8bego2h7yYo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=QQrs+y Jn/CM30GJHbVeuyPswp352BR7jPfmzVOfMogmlBXPnrqruqRefDw/OFpRR7kdSdE BpiX3FQ7WWMUPSxF9kbhbSmZhBoXaBN/5Z2MSyFPm/fC4bWEbx79mCUHaqkFd96U PmVMIcGRIxon4Bz2n117LoKVX9ddtLnMMbN2A= Received: from [192.168.1.68] (188-220-36-32.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.36.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CDEDE6209; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:37:37 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4EEA3055.1030605@cran.org.uk> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:37:25 +0000 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com><4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com><4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de><20111215004205.GA11556@icarus.home.lan> <4eea1a4a.nJRbEc1jgKpVnVk4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <5350EDAC93604B6E93EDBD65A3038F88@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <5350EDAC93604B6E93EDBD65A3038F88@multiplay.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tevans.uk@googlemail.com, perryh@pluto.rain.com, attilio@freebsd.org, george+freebsd@m5p.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de, freebsd@jdc.parodius.com Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:37:40 -0000 On 15/12/2011 14:20, Steven Hartland wrote: > So for this use ULE vs 4BSD is neither here-nor-there > but 9.0 buildworld is very slow (x2 slower) compared > with 8.2 so whats a bigger question in my mind. clang is new in 9.0 and takes a long time to build. -- Bruce Cran