From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 27 00:22:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA21893 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 00:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA21881 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 00:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199707270722.AAA21881@hub.freebsd.org> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA248256867; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 17:01:07 +1000 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: ipfw divert, transparent proxy To: kernel@acromail.ml.org (FreeBSD Technical Reader) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 17:01:07 +1000 (EST) Cc: danny@panda.hilink.com.au, danj@3skel.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "FreeBSD Technical Reader" at Jul 26, 97 12:32:31 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In some mail from FreeBSD Technical Reader, sie said: > > I know I could be banned for life for saying this --- but you could also > use a linux machine and the ipmasquerading built into the kernel for doing > this, there are no equivalent features in FreeBSD and it works much better > than natd (Ipmasquerading is one of the things i miss from linux). Please > forgive me for this sin. Ugh.. I hate seeing people promote broken algorithms which they've come to love. Darren