Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:58:44 +0100
From:      Thomas Gellekum <Thomas.Gellekum@gmx.de>
To:        pav@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        glewis@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [Fwd: eclipse-devel-3.6.1 failed on amd64 8]
Message-ID:  <86y68qhjp7.fsf@siegel.tg.intern>
In-Reply-To: <1289338625.11542.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> (Pav Lucistnik's message of "Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:37:05 %2B0100")
References:  <1289338625.11542.1.camel@hood.oook.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Looking at the error report again:

>> PATCH_DEPENDS=apache-ant-1.7.1.tbz desktop-file-utils-0.15_2.tbz gamin-0.1.10_4.tbz gettext-0.18.1.1.tbz gio-fam-backend-2.24.2.tbz glib-2.24.2.tbz inputproto-2.0.tbz javavmwrapper-2.3.5.tbz jdk-1.6.0.3p4_19.tbz kbproto-1.0.4.tbz libX11-1.3.3_1,1.tbz libXau-1.0.5.tbz libXdmcp-1.0.3.tbz libXext-1.1.1,1.tbz libXi-1.3,1.tbz libXtst-1.1.0.tbz libiconv-1.13.1_1.tbz libpthread-stubs-0.3_3.tbz libxcb-1.7.tbz patch-2.6.1_1.tbz pcre-8.10.tbz perl-5.10.1_3.tbz pkg-config-0.25_1.tbz python26-2.6.6.tbz recordproto-1.14.tbz xextproto-7.1.1.tbz xproto-7.0.16.tbz zip-3.0.tbz

This defines a dependency on jdk-1.6.0.3p4_19, whereas we explicitly
specify JAVA_VENDOR=openjdk in the makefile. Do we need to do anything
special to make the patch phase recognize the dependency correctly? Are
there just some definitions missing from bsd.java.mk?

tg



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86y68qhjp7.fsf>