From owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Thu Aug 27 14:33:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AD69C38F5 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allan@physics.umn.edu) Received: from mail.physics.umn.edu (smtp.spa.umn.edu [128.101.220.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BCFE5E for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allan@physics.umn.edu) Received: from c-66-41-25-68.hsd1.mn.comcast.net ([66.41.25.68] helo=[192.168.0.117]) by mail.physics.umn.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUyEd-0007DO-MZ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:32:59 -0500 Subject: Re: mps driver on 10.2-BETA To: Konstantin Kulikov , freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org References: <55DE5365.6090608@physics.umn.edu> From: Graham Allan Message-ID: <55DF1F78.2080204@physics.umn.edu> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:32:24 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:33:03 -0000 I definitely had the same issues others reported with the 20.00.00.00 firmware (though using FreeBSD 9.3). I was building a new system at the time so was able to stress test it with different firmware versions - 20 gave errors, 19 and 16 were fine. I have another system which isn't in production yet - I can do the same test on that and see if the newer 20.00.00.04 is stable. This is also running 9.3 but the test should still be valid. I will be using this system for 10.2 testing, but would like to keep it on 9.3 for a short time to try and resolve any issues with that. I wonder if some advice about firmware could be added to the mps man page? Even at this point I'm not certain what the absolute best practice is, whether driver and firmware versions should match, or (as FreeNAS developers seemed to imply) firmware should be >= driver. Graham On 8/27/2015 4:30 AM, Konstantin Kulikov wrote: > Hey. > I will get a new LSI card in maybe two weeks and will test with new > firmware and 10.2-RELEASE. >