Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:49:54 +0800 From: Sato Kentney <satokentney@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Net <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dragonflybsd's ipfw Message-ID: <CAD3kpuUJs%2B2cDqgUsSX=nWQgY29s70YV6fJXksjLn55uJFdceg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAC%2BJH2w4uATRBmmPifYdVcH5hSofmxZCbwzyG5r%2B7w%2BwfraM4Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD3kpuU8jQjMdfEiGNwYLToJDSZWGbJgQTzGeAFEw1UBLY4M3Q@mail.gmail.com> <20141117193354.T31139@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CAD3kpuX8ruHA%2BnqGNp6vhLJdCpBv1M_G1OS%2BCROXU8te9kUF8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAC%2BJH2w4uATRBmmPifYdVcH5hSofmxZCbwzyG5r%2B7w%2BwfraM4Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, his ipfw2 is ok for test now. http://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/12/11/15220.html i meet some problem in testing so asking qesstion in drafonflybsd's email list. and i want to know is it correct that the ipfw2 is faster than ipfw in freebsd? it is what he said. sure i will test it by myself. thanks On 25 November 2014 at 09:17, bycn82 <bycn82@gmail.com> wrote: > > *that ipfw2 means "ipfw too", because it is originally from FreeBSD and > totally not new create things, IMHO* > > *BTW Sato, I think the in-kernel NAT is almost there, I tested the basic > NAT and it works in my lab environment.* > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Sato Kentney <satokentney@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> i agree, >> i am not good in english as networking administor from Tokyo. >> but when i read the page, i see that the main idea is so call "modular >> design" and there is a long way to catch up the freebsd's ipfw >> >> anyway, i dont think it can compare to freebsd's ipfw, as Smith said the= ir >> ipfw is the version without in-kernel NAT and tables .all these importan= t >> features >> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:48:13 +0800, Sato Kentney wrote: >> > >> > > I saw a email in dragonflybsd email list, someone is doing this! >> > > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/ >> > >> > We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help wondering wh= y >> > DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and experience >> > rather than using bycn82's 'rewrite'? .. but DF already has ipfw2: >> > >> > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=3Dipfw§ion=3DANY >> > >> > man page dated October 2008. Before tables, in-kernel NAT, later >> > dummynet updates and no doubt more. So why not start from there? >> > >> > cheers, Ian >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> =E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=8C=E3=81=A8=E3=81=86 >> =E4=BD=90=E8=97=A4=E6=9F=AF=E5=BE=B7 >> Sato K. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > --=20 =E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=8C=E3=81=A8=E3=81=86 =E4=BD=90=E8=97=A4=E6=9F=AF=E5=BE=B7 Sato K.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAD3kpuUJs%2B2cDqgUsSX=nWQgY29s70YV6fJXksjLn55uJFdceg>