From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 18 18:24:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from acl.lanl.gov (acl.lanl.gov [128.165.147.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8841C37B401 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1128720 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 19:24:08 -0600 Received: from snaresland.acl.lanl.gov (128.165.147.113) by acl.lanl.gov with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 19:24:08 -0600 Received: (qmail 22696 invoked by uid 3499); 18 Oct 2001 19:24:07 -0600 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 19:24:07 -0600 Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:24:07 -0600 (MDT) From: Ronald G Minnich X-X-Sender: To: Rayson Ho Cc: Subject: Re: clustering code In-Reply-To: <20011018234715.26096.qmail@web11404.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Rayson Ho wrote: > If you are going to build clusters with over 1000 nodes, you should > then install a batch system instead of using kernel-based clustering > services. I thought we took this one private. Anyway, as I said in private, scalable kernel services for clustering and batch systems are orthogonal, hence I don't agree. ron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message