From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 13:02:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7729D10656B0 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pbormida@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E658FC08 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so168931gwb.13 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 06:02:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5AIBESLjGrPUybwkOnBgB/7WJnjOdQrpVPvWRnqL+KI=; b=JHwjJS1i+5JapK22WDNm7lCkx6XkLp/LhAIhvlDi9o2Onu0GBCa5teSMCvHTIm8/lY ba9vofk1oV6z4CuaqwaZ/uPWGft+HoNXH0M/r6OAHhV8P0YMzKnWytJNYJ5M4uDcH8TG cNA94Htw2dAO9nQwieEzzNwVPTl1E7ObprfXM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=I53MMX/PKjo5vR05u1BXm1O6JYhHGQQkQOcPBf5JDJk3yPj92CqpTM1yywGPZmUVhp bsK7WDmAKPHhHu5o8FpITBBuhfqfag/VJs7bkhPEFEeUkkEhEuyqxPeGODg/7OpXUH0p TrX/1CPuXxlClrzASyq6vAqEvWR8J2Zd2GavY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.95.15 with SMTP id s15mr1006992ybb.13.1285158773282; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 05:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.5.203 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 05:32:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86tylij8pu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86tylij8pu.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:32:53 +0200 Message-ID: From: Paolo Bormida To: Anonymous Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: amule-10275 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:02:49 -0000 Nice to know that amule will get more frequent updates, and the new knobs are great as well, but isn't risky to use snapshots for a port? Are there any policies about what to base a port upon? And yes, you are correct about the availability of the sparc64 packages. Can the new knobs be used to do a gui-less build of amule? Thanx Paolo 2010/9/22 Anonymous > Paolo Bormida writes: > > > Does amule2 port switched from a stable 2.2.5 release to a daily > > snapshot? > > Yes, snapshots are gonna be used unless there are more frequent releases > upstream. You can find the history of changes on freshports. > > http://www.freshports.org/net-p2p/amule2 > > The package name also switched from `aMule' to `amule' in order to > remove silly vendor capitalization and match port *directory* name. > > Besides, I plan to rename the port to plain `amule' with the next update > in order to remove last bit of confusion, i.e. `2' version suffix in > port directory name and in LATEST_LINK. > > > Does the sparc64 port still has the daily snapshot instead of the more > > up-to-date 2.2.6_4 available? > > aMule-10266.tbz and amule-10275.tbz are newer than aMule-2.2.6_4.tbz > unless I'm missing smth. > > $ pkg_version > aMule < > $ portmaster -L > ===>>> aMule-2.2.6_4 > ===>>> New version available: amule-10275 > > I can only find aMule-10266.tbz for sparc64 for 8-stable, though. > -- ----------------------- Paolo Bormida Giaveno - Torino ----------------------- Italy -----------------------