From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Nov 11 20:20:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA20965 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 20:20:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dream.future.net (future.net [204.130.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA20960 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 20:20:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tomthai@future.net) Received: from dream.future.net (tomthai@future.net [204.130.134.1]) by dream.future.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id WAA18478; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:11:24 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:11:24 -0600 (CST) From: "Tom T. Thai" To: Lukman Salim cc: FreeBSD-isp Subject: Re: Using NAT for ISP customer In-Reply-To: <364A5E05.E94B00A2@usa.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org you mean you are laying in your own coax to the residential areas? Impressive ;-) I wonder if we can do that in the US yet ;-) Personaly I wouldn't use a snap for production.. but that's just me. On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Lukman Salim wrote: > Hmm, I don't get your question. It's a standard Hybrid Fiber Coax > implementation. Currently we will deploy mainly in residential area. > We'll be using an MCNS (an industry standard) or similar system. > > Didn't mention it before, we're in Jakarta, Indonesia. The fibers are > from the state telco. Sorry for the diversion. > > BTW, because of the NIC that I use (3c905b: the xl driver) I had to use > a SNAP release kernel. Is it safe to use on a production server? Any > suggestions? > > > Tom T. Thai wrote: > > > > just curious, how are you getting the cable lines? > > > > .............. .................................... > > Thomas T. Thai Infomedia Interactive Communications > > tom@iic.net TEL 612.376.9090 * FAX 612.376.9087 > > > > On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Lukman Salim wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I will be starting a cable-modem based ISP in the near future. Because > > > of the potential concurrent online user among the cable modem user would > > > be a lot greater than traditional ISP, I'm thinking of using local IP > > > with NAT for those who don't need real IP. Has anyone had any experience > > > with such a scheme using FreeBSD's natd? I know that some apps would not > > > run, but does the majority of Internet user use such software? > > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > Lukman > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message