From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Nov  9 07:00:27 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA12215
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 07:00:27 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from root.com (root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA12152
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 07:00:13 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from root@root.com)
Received: from root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA04321;
	Mon, 9 Nov 1998 07:01:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199811091501.HAA04321@root.com>
To: "Larry S. Lile" <lile@stdio.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: mbuf question 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Nov 1998 09:49:35 EST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.96.981109094709.26563B-100000@heathers.stdio.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 07:01:31 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>Are mbufs allocated below the 16M area?
>
>If they are, is it likely to change?
>
>Why?  Because I am trying to eliminate bcopy's and mallocs in my 
>token-ring driver to gain a little more performance.

   They're allocated throughout the machine's physical address space.

-DG

David Greenman
Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message