From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 19:51:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACA43E0; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07F112EB8; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9UJptYl082746; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:51:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r9UJpssh082743; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:51:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:51:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Gabor Pali Subject: Re: State of the Porters' Handbook In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <526E272D.3040607@marino.st> <526E2E8D.3020109@bsdforen.de> <526E2FB8.5060906@marino.st> <526E3454.60501@bsdforen.de> <526E3685.4070306@marino.st> <526E3986.7050304@bsdforen.de> <526E3BC2.6030004@marino.st> <526E3F32.2040704@bsdforen.de> <20131028145645.GE74512@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20131028160458.5f7add4c@bsd64.grem.de> <20131028151145.GF74512@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:51:55 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Eitan Adler X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:51:58 -0000 On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Gabor Pali wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> We generally don't refer to pkgng in the docs: please use "pkg". > > Well, I saw pkg written as "pkgng" in some other section (5.2.2.2. > "PORTEPOCH") of the Porter's Handbook. Actually, I prefer to write it > as pkg(8), but I am not sure if there has been a DocBook entity > defined for it. Just checked, and presently there is no man page entity for it. Using a man page entity might be questionable anyway: there is no man page for pkg on FreeBSD 9 and earlier unless ports-mgmt/pkg has been installed. (I'm not going to mention /usr/sbin/pkg, which should not have been given the same name because now we can't tell which "pkg" is being discussed. See how I didn't mention it there?) >> Further, I'd put the pkg cases first as the pkg_ tools are deprecated. > > I do not think that matters much. Agreed. Actually, until pkg_* is deprecated for 9.x and earlier, it is by far the most common.