From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 21:41:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01C01065674 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 21:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D9C8FC0A for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 21:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30749 invoked by uid 399); 7 Jan 2011 21:41:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 7 Jan 2011 21:41:36 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4D27888F.4090703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:41:35 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101210 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitry Andric References: <4D277E4B.1030006@FreeBSD.org> <4D27840A.8020107@FreeBSD.org> <4D2785A7.7080106@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4D2785A7.7080106@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Merge of binutils 2.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:41:37 -0000 On 01/07/2011 13:29, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2011-01-07 22:22, Doug Barton wrote: >> This is much appreciated work of course, but I'm wondering if you've >> requested an experimental ports run with the change? It would be good to >> know how much damage to expect before the change gets committed. > > Yes, I submitted an exp-run request Nov 15, 2010: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152268 Ah, well done then. :) > Unfortunately, there has been little or no interest. Fair enough, that sounds to me like portmgr is volunteering to clean up the mess then. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/