From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 13 06:40:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEF416A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 06:40:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mortis.over-yonder.net (adsl-222-119-207.jan.bellsouth.net
	[68.222.119.207])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C0043D2D
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 13 Nov 2004 06:40:12 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net)
Received: by mortis.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100)
	id 2CAFD20F9F; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:40:11 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:40:10 -0600
From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
To: Sean Page <Sean.Page@epsb.ca>
Message-ID: <20041113064010.GQ41090@over-yonder.net>
References: <1FE05C67E513D9119F31000F1F6C220742C3@EXCHANGE08>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1FE05C67E513D9119F31000F1F6C220742C3@EXCHANGE08>
X-Editor: vi
X-OS: FreeBSD <http://www.freebsd.org/>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i-fullermd.2
cc: "'freebsd-ports@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Name resolution performance in BIND9
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 06:40:13 -0000

On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 03:16:51PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Sean Page, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> I am finding that BIND9 (installed to replace the base install of
> BIND) is taking from 4-8 seconds to resolve a name that isn't
> cached, where the same lookup on BIND8 will occur in less than a
> second.

FWIW, this is a recent thing; I've run the same version of BIND9 for
ages, and this just started about the time some servers added v6
addresses (but that isn't the cause; I don't know what is).


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/

"The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I
      haven't figured out how to light the middle yet"