Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Mar 1999 10:01:04 -0800 (PST)
From:      Mark Diekhans <markd@Grizzly.COM>
To:        sprice@hiwaay.net
Cc:        freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@lojic.com, dwilde1@thuntek.net
Subject:   Re: A BSD-licensed JIT (was Re: Development Projects)
Message-ID:  <199903271801.KAA10685@osprey.grizzly.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.02.9903271116530.22203-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net> (message from Steve Price on Sat, 27 Mar 1999 11:47:20 -0600 (CST))
References:   <Pine.OSF.4.02.9903271116530.22203-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
># What is the importance of getting a JIT under a BSD-license?
>
>This is a flamebait question intended to draw me into yet another
>licensing war, but I'll bite long enough to say this.

No it is not! Take the question at face value.  I do a lot of server-side Java
development and see FreeBSD as an excellent platform for such applications
once the JVM can compete with the Solaris JVM.

I am no fan of the GPL and all open source software I have release is under a
BSD-style license.

Given that FreeBSD is fairly dependent on GPL-ed code anyway (e.g. gcc) and
the way a JIT is licensed has no impact (that I can see) on its use, it
doesn't seem near as important as just having a really solid java environment.

>Doesn't matter which one is the best right now.  Find me one
>that isn't GPL'd and I would gladly pick it up and help extend
>it.

Ok, that answered the question.  Good luck with your effort.

Mark


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903271801.KAA10685>