From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 26 0:22:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5451C14CC1; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 00:22:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA02867; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 09:21:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Cc: Assar Westerlund , obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3c509b getting `eeprom failed to come ready' in current In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Nov 1999 03:18:56 EST." Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 09:21:22 +0100 Message-ID: <2865.943604482@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: >On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> Can we somehow mark the if_ep as "fickle hardware" so it gets probed >> before the if_ex/it_ie ? We used to have such a facility. > >I'm going to look closer at those two drivers and find the place where >they disagree with if_ep. They don't disagree, they do some stuff to some registers to detect their respective hardware, which unfortunately hoses a ep0 card if one happens to be there instead. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message