From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 22:37:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0570B16A41B for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org) Received: from redundancy.redundancy.org (redundancy.redundancy.org [64.147.160.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D732013C467 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:37:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org) Received: (qmail 32097 invoked by uid 1001); 12 Dec 2007 22:10:53 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:10:53 -0800 From: "David E. Thiel" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071212221030.GD43736@redundancy.redundancy.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20071212073944.GC29211@soaustin.net> <20071212080932.GA30438@soaustin.net> <20071212083658.GA31114@soaustin.net> <47602AC8.7060609@csub.edu> <20071212190150.GB11620@jack.stsp.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071212190150.GB11620@jack.stsp.lan> X-OpenPGP-Key-fingerprint: 482A 8C46 C844 7E7C 8CBC 2313 96EE BEE5 1F4B CA13 X-Face: %H~{$1~NOw1y#%mM6{|4:/ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:37:12 -0000 On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:01:27PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > I really don't see why the extreme action of removing it from ports was necessary. :sigh: > > An alternative is to simply keep the last released version > that had a sane license. Or simply use any of the freely available, cleanly licensed and more functional alternatives, many of which are written by programmers posessing an at least marginal semblance of sanity: - wmii - dwm - xmonad - larswm - awesome (my personal favorite) They all have their cranky peculiarities, but at least the authors aren't balls-out insane, and don't habitually harass OS distributors with their paranoid ravings. There's no reason to use ion anymore, much less let an old version rot in the ports tree. If people still want to for some reason, they can just keep a copy of the old port or build it from scratch.