Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 00:24:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" <jamil@counterintelligence.ml.org> To: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> Cc: Atipa <freebsd@atipa.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sessreg, and Webramp M3 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970808002127.483A-100000@counterintelligence.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970807161317.23983C-100000@shell.uniserve.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
i thought that multilink ppp had to also be supported by the router on the other end to work properly the webramp claims to do without this (you can use ant combination of different service providers /static/dynamic ip's etc., naybye this only works because of the way most web servers operate), well I am getting an Ascend Pipeline 50 and dedicated line so i guess it is not really that important :) On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Tom wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Jamil J. Weatherbee wrote: > > > 2. How would a person with multiple modems attached (suppose through a > > cyclades card) make a freebsd do whatever tricks the Webramp M3 does with > > uses multiple modems on presumably multiple IP addresses, much like a > > multihoned network but without gated. > > I thought the Webramp use multilink PPP (MP) to bond multiple modems > into one PPP interface? So it really isn't multiple interfaces or > multihomed at all. > > You can use the mpd (in ports?). It is basically the stock ppp, with MP > features. > > Tom > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970808002127.483A-100000>