From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 16 08:09:20 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA19796 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 08:09:20 -0700 Received: from squid.umd.edu (squid.umd.edu [129.2.40.6]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id IAA19790 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 08:09:14 -0700 Received: by squid.umd.edu (5.65/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA21228; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 11:18:14 -0400 From: fcawth@squid.umd.edu (Fred Cawthorne) Message-Id: <9506161518.AA21228@squid.umd.edu> Subject: netatalk support anyone??? To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 16 Jun 95 11:18:14 EDT X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11] Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk This would be a good thing to have working. It appears that support from the netatalk people has been in the works for some time now. I don't know exactly how much progress has been done on their end. Has anybody played with this thing at all??? It is certainly a much more elegant solution for appletalk support than cap. I don't really know my way around the networking code enough to do a good job at integrating this into the kernel, but I guess I could learn. Is anybody else interested in getting this going? Fred.