Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 00:21:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/pc98/conf GENERIC src/sys/sparc64/conf GENERIC Message-ID: <200409080721.i887LqGW040507@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <34626.1094625991@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 Sep, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20040908024335.T26496@mail.chesapeake.net>, Jeff Roberson writes: > >>What's not working well enough with ULE to run with it? > > On thing I have observed on my laptop is that it can take up to 30 seconds > for a process to get a signal counting from when I type CTRL-C. There is also the problem that CPU bound processes that are "nice" get the same or slightly more CPU time than CPU bound processes that are not "nice" when they are both in competition for CPU cycles. The problem is that both converge on the same priority, and even though the less nice processes are assigned a longer time slice, they keep getting put at the end of the run queue before they have used up their slice.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409080721.i887LqGW040507>