From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 29 17:43:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA18731 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 29 May 1997 17:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sparrow.sanasys.com ([206.101.242.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA18718 for ; Thu, 29 May 1997 17:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nschuler ([206.101.242.163]) by sparrow.sanasys.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA14759; Thu, 29 May 1997 19:31:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <2.2.32.19970530004324.006d3108@sparrow.sanasys.com> X-Sender: nschuler@sparrow.sanasys.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 19:43:24 -0500 To: Paul Dekkers From: Nathan Schuler Subject: Re: atapi Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Linux did the best, is that true? (there's a list below, I couldn't find >FreeBSD in it, but BSDI?!) Not sure. But as for file system performance, nothing beats the BSD UNIX's. This list was most likely setup for corporate users. I use BSDI 3.0 and BSDI 2.1 in my office. >OS put to /dev/null get to /dev/null Webstone throughput >without Router 870 kbyte/s 910 kbyte/s 6.97 Mbit/s >SCO OpenServer 430 460 3.51 >BSDI OS 2.1 580 620 4.76 >Linux 2.0.18 620 630 4.77 >NT Server 4.0 580 600 4.85 >Intranetware 4.11 540 580 4.74 Nathan Schuler UNIX Netwoking Solutions / Systems Administrator Sana Systems Inc. Clinton, IA 52732 (319) 242-5770