Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:53:39 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)
Message-ID:  <F73D89C4-4E7F-469E-8613-17427231E5C0@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <45E32F4F-A238-47AA-8E1E-7AD4D9E857D9@dsl-only.net>
References:  <3EDEF0B7-59C5-4648-9737-6682E18645BC@dsl-only.net> <39C60316-F905-490D-B0AB-BC24D7F351A2@dsl-only.net> <7F94CE59-D2CC-4D6F-B1CD-FF3D1F8EDCE7@FreeBSD.org> <45E32F4F-A238-47AA-8E1E-7AD4D9E857D9@dsl-only.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_54747A7A-60FC-41AE-A610-0C40033DAA05
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

On 27 Mar 2017, at 12:25, Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> wrote:
> 
> On 2017-Mar-27, at 2:41 AM, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>> On 26 Mar 2017, at 23:36, Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> wrote:
...
>>> Installed packages to be REMOVED:
>>> 	llvm40-4.0.0.r4
>>> 
>>> Number of packages to be removed: 1
>>> 
>>> The operation will free 49 GiB.
>> 
>> Yes, this is big.  But there is no real need to build the llvm ports
>> with debug information, unless you want to hack on llvm itself.  And
>> in that case, you are better served by a Subversion checkout or Git
>> clone from upstream instead.
...
> Historically unless something extreme like this ends up
> involved I build everything using WITH_DEBUG=  or explicit
> -g's in order to have better information on any failure.

The problem with the ports implementation of WITH_DEBUG is that it
always disables all optimizations, without a possibility to override.
Which bloats the resulting object files, libraries and executables, and
especially so for large C++ projects such as LLVM.

I can recommend the following workaround.  If you want to build a port
with optimizations disabled, you can always pass -O0 in CFLAGS.

-Dimitry

Index: Mk/bsd.port.mk
===================================================================
--- Mk/bsd.port.mk	(revision 436685)
+++ Mk/bsd.port.mk	(working copy)
@@ -1646,7 +1646,7 @@ MAKE_ENV+=	DONTSTRIP=yes
 STRIP_CMD=	${TRUE}
 .endif
 DEBUG_FLAGS?=	-g
-CFLAGS:=		${CFLAGS:N-O*:N-fno-strict*} ${DEBUG_FLAGS}
+CFLAGS:=		${CFLAGS} ${DEBUG_FLAGS}
 .if defined(INSTALL_TARGET)
 INSTALL_TARGET:=	${INSTALL_TARGET:S/^install-strip$/install/g}
 .endif


--Apple-Mail=_54747A7A-60FC-41AE-A610-0C40033DAA05
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.30

iEYEARECAAYFAljZC1kACgkQsF6jCi4glqNJ9ACaA7mkaSbBsbXWA54kbVSMwc/k
vn8AoIAUO0WmGfOZ1OWXdQfDsgreAgpo
=6gZ8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_54747A7A-60FC-41AE-A610-0C40033DAA05--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F73D89C4-4E7F-469E-8613-17427231E5C0>