Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:53:32 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Cc:        smp@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Testers please! 
Message-ID:  <21170.937814012@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:24:47 %2B0800." <19990920012447.C1C1B1CC5@overcee.netplex.com.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Ok, noted.  I changed to to fail the probe but still use the hardware.

Poul-Henning

In message <19990920012447.C1C1B1CC5@overcee.netplex.com.au>, Peter Wemm writes
:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> 
>> If you have a PIIX4 based SMP system and run current, could you
>> please try out this patch:
>> 
>> 	http://phk.freebsd.dk/piix/
>> 
>> I'm very interested in hearing if there are any measurable difference
>> apart from clock granularity being 3 times better.
>
>There is a problem with it as it tries to claim the same device as claimed
>by pcisupport.c and intpm.c..  pcisupport.c is where some folks have been
>hanging Tor Egge's RTC SMI trap patch from..
>
>Cheers,
>-Peter
>--
>Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au
>
>

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21170.937814012>