From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 12:34:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347C31065672 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:34:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from rincewind.paeps.cx (rincewind.paeps.cx [IPv6:2002:596a:f092::149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF80A8FC13 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from luggage.be.softathome.com (94-225-67-130.access.telenet.be [94.225.67.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: philip) by rincewind.paeps.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C52FD744E4; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:34:11 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Philip Paeps In-Reply-To: <4e5ba9c3.bzHIw1KEy8R2QcK7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:34:13 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3420B331-C697-468A-80BA-B31C33804710@freebsd.org> References: <35765857-1314243257-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-329610575-@b2.c15.bise7.blackberry> <4e5ba9c3.bzHIw1KEy8R2QcK7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Official git export X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:34:15 -0000 On 29 Aug 2011, at 17:01, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Vadim Goncharov wrote: >> May be FreeBSD should really write it's own VCS, just as Git was >> modelled after proprietary BitKeeper?.. > > Good luck getting agreement on what to model it on :) > > Personally I would suggest ClearCase as a model, but that's largely > because I'm familiar with it. Wait... you're familiar with ClearCase and you want something that's modelled like it? Most people familiar with ClearCase consider it to be a dire warning of what a VCS can become, not an example. :) I think any system where the server has to keep track of every client's files is pretty much obsolete in 2011. It scales unbelievably poorly. - Philip -- Philip Paeps Senior Reality Engineer Ministry of Information