From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Aug 15 04:14:05 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B487BB7438
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 15 Aug 2016 04:14:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AD6E1EE3
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 04:14:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u7F4E4cS000249
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 04:14:04 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 211837] POLA violation : SVR4(32bit binaries)  does not operate.
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 04:14:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-211837-8-jYijtt8A9l@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-211837-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-211837-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 04:14:05 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211837

Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp

--- Comment #1 from Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> ---
One additional info.
Thoroughout discussion with Kenji on freebsd-users-jp ML (in Japanese),
I feel the old binary is possibly NOT actually a SVR4 one, but a FreeBSD
binary with lost ELF branding and having unusual brand interpreter path.

 *Cannot confirm as he says the program was given from his customer
  [or supplier] in pre-built binary only.


If I understand properly, default 10.2-RELEASE (amd64) shouldn't have
svr4.ko or built-in support for SVR4 in GENERIC kernel. (Would need
custom kernel or special build option.)

Anyway, any binary stops working within major release lifecycle should be
considered POLA violation, although keeping old behaviour after 11.0 would
need further investigation.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=