From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Mar 4 18:12:00 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F49151D618 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722A377296 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2BEFF151D60C; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AADC151D60A for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87DCD77288 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B521DFB32 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x24IBwKP035342 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:11:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x24IBwhm035337 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:11:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236062] [exp-run] Against projects/clang800-import branch Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 18:11:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: dim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: exp-run? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 18:12:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236062 --- Comment #4 from Dimitry Andric --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #3) > Can you expedite landing in order to MFC to /stable/11 and /stable/12 > *before* the slush? Sure, I'm fine with that. I requested this exp-run specifically to ensure = that there are no major problems with ports. And indeed, the number of failures seems to be quite low, and most are easy to fix (if a bit cumbersome). > -Werror bustage with few if any blocked ports can be safely ignored for t= he > maintainers are often at fault for keeping the flag by default. In many > cases -Werror is used together with -Wall, -Wextra, -Weverything, etc. wh= ich > practically asks for bustage on compiler upgrade. Yup, let's suppress those warnings, unless they are trivial to fix. > Once FreeBSD 12.0 reaches EOL I'd like to start lifting LLD_UNSAFE. LLD 8 > would help with that e.g., bug 233740 comment 10. >=20 > If C++20 is released during FreeBSD 11.3/12.1 lifetime ports may have > growing pains because libc++ cannot be easily replaced. And USES=3Dcompil= er > better remain nop to avoid exp-run churn. The C++20 support in libc++ 8.0 is obviously not 100% finished either, but = it's pretty OK for at least some time. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=