From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 9 22:49:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D58FCA823D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 22:49:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4463B1C5C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 22:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A26728451; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 23:49:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FF2028426; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 23:49:00 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client To: Jan Bramkamp , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <5874135B.4000900@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 23:48:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 22:49:10 -0000 Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30: > On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install >> both samba44 >> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? >> Or samba44 and KDE? >> >> If yes, then that sucks... > > Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set > the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary > packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see > removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the > complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build time to disable > this dependency (e.g. a bad security track record/process, different > licenses)? And what is the right way to choose SASL / NON-SASL version globaly? We are building packages in our poudriere, but I cannot find the proper variable / option for this. Miroslav Lachman