Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:08:31 -0800 From: David Benfell <benfell@parts-unknown.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: switching from ports to pkg -- mailman group mismatch Message-ID: <20141205010831.GA11940@home.parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <5480D0E7.60103@bluerosetech.com> References: <20141204045849.GA4247@home.parts-unknown.org> <5480846B.9090908@bluerosetech.com> <20141204164259.GA45875@home.parts-unknown.org> <5480D0E7.60103@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 01:23:51PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: >=20 > That likely means mailman assumes there's a sendmail program it can use= =20 > for mail injection. Does it "just work" if you tell postfix to activate= =20 > itself in mailer.conf? >=20 Postfix is already selected in mailer.conf. Apparently postfix's sendmail is not a substitute for the real sendmail in mailman unless it is configured and built with postfix selected. > It's fine to mix them. I have a handful of ports on everyt system I=20 > have to compile myself--mostly because I want them linked to the ports=20 > OpenSSL, but there are some that need non-default values. I just keep=20 > them locked so a pkg-upgrade doesn't touch them. >=20 > If you end up with a lot of compiled ports, set up poudrerie. I will look into this. At the moment, I only have mailman that I know *must* be built from the port. >=20 > Where did you see this advice? About all that happens is pkg will=20 > report "options changed" and want to reinstall it from the package.=20 > Pkg-lock is your friend. Yes, I must look into pkg lock. I believe the advice about sticking with default options was on this list in response to someone else having trouble with ports. This is where, perhaps, my desire for ports where all the options work is unsustainable: The work of maintaining a port must expand, probably more than exponentially, if all combinations of options must be tested. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell <benfell@parts-unknown.org> See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUgQWJAAoJEBV64x4SNmArHC4QAKiL2NT8+DcdDzTx+kiZvFlk pLd+71pfw92GlBdRgn/3gkEo/SDt07LvpeHQrZr7LxI0kVAc8yQd3p4YraMB1mIG oav0Ovkl13njE8Q5Uw6GK+emO2sSFp+RdHh16EqKphSJDxyGiWNDWXTmYLoZ172p qsOqucl+O0yHQIA197TOI9LF6P3k9KE2eIvRvVwgb8hYpsCeOPKOGr9qJ6+sHlC5 ezPolFxebuqL3rfkJfBkfUYnQ7F1+feDTg/d5Tw1v9lyXGZw/zl9JQ4rGjZFziet h6bT3gaGIU9TA5i5yIdHhP1PWt8QiqkHNQtMEEH32eWs67IWRXiSLgHuzpqgJ8xX AjOCIQ4UgqpU8FKHx7yUPGoW07Iks4NFHE0sHkRJNDmr8GP4u7cSnXMR9cc8uVyV rBLh3RkQO+MmMQFUbnlkHPHzRsWAbsb2Gbs3fSTtSCPE2fltfttYPkW/W+eJ5Sh8 HmLfJhuWQhfG7CNXNDS6/v5A+Mq5FXFiywsnn/Y6Qz4KeBPJmneX3mP4qIhOI32I I+wQisk+w8vNUlRSj8woKtCmCm6+u5YL04kb0p2Paw2Jhu86WTAJP8PyYNzjAPhS UIHH1aIReKUND1s00zhQV42MNH8hCGyL5bvOBOx9lQQZDpBfKqUmOYu9TPkucKMp k+k3GPeS3mKAtp4vMUC+ =hGWX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141205010831.GA11940>