Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:24:12 -0800
From:      "Jerry Toung" <jrytoung@gmail.com>
To:        "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=" <des@des.no>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: a new syscalls table
Message-ID:  <86068e730801261324j33b7ae8cyc8faec5141f7555a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <86y7acmhrg.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <86068e730801251451n650b7abcyf3d008fddec2c33f@mail.gmail.com> <86y7acmhrg.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you DES. I am running 6.2 by the way.
Jerry

On 1/26/08, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
>
> "Jerry Toung" <jrytoung@gmail.com> writes:
> > I am trying to create an environment where you can't run my binaries
> > on your box and I can't run your binaries on my system (x86 platform).
> > For that, I have modified the system calls table (i.e everything is
> > offset by 5).
>
> This is basically the same as "sidegrading" from i386 to amd64 or vice
> versa.  If you're using 7 or 8, the installworld target sets aside all
> the tools it needs to complete the installation, so it doesn't matter
> that the binaries you install can't run on your current kernel.  Just
> make sure you run installkernel first.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86068e730801261324j33b7ae8cyc8faec5141f7555a>