Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:04:20 -0500 From: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: perl 5.8.3 in ports Message-ID: <335B8280-7DDF-11D8-8206-000A9578CFCC@kcilink.com> In-Reply-To: <200403242254.07520.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <CC6C8028-7DC6-11D8-8206-000A9578CFCC@kcilink.com> <200403242050.35769.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <1FD0CB34-7DD8-11D8-8206-000A9578CFCC@kcilink.com> <200403242254.07520.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 24, 2004, at 4:54 PM, Michael Nottebrock wrote: >> Personally, I prefer not to be poked at my direct email since I >> monitor >> this list, but I suppose I could email tobez directly, too. > > That's a pretty strange notion - port maintainers need to supply a > valid mail > address for the MAINTAINER field for a reason. > Until you have a very popular port, at which time about 30 seconds after the author releases an update you start getting pounded with repeated questions of when will it be updated. At least on ports@ it is publicly archived.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?335B8280-7DDF-11D8-8206-000A9578CFCC>