Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 06:10:01 -0800 (PST) From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/32321: x11/kdelibs2 installs print/cups, which then causes problems Message-ID: <200111271410.fAREA1908496@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/32321; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: David Leimbach <leimbacd@bellsouth.net> Cc: Will Andrews <will@csociety.purdue.edu>, kde-freebsd@lists.csociety.org, kde@FreeBSD.org, Garance A Drosihn <gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu>, desmo@bandwidth.org, jah4007@cs.rit.edu, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/32321: x11/kdelibs2 installs print/cups, which then causes problems Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:01:03 -0500 On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 07:49:27AM -0600, David Leimbach wrote: > That's a good enough rationale for me... Just so long as the QT-designer > port doesn't fall behind... :) Of course not. The qt-designer port is a slave port of the Qt port. So basically, what I need to do is figure out how to make it depend even more on the Qt port so that if I update the Qt port, it won't break the qt-designer port. Or in other words, I need to make it so that there's just a simple compile switch that has to be called to pick the "qt side of sub-tools" and the "qt-designer side of sub-tools". It shouldn't be hard to do... wanna give it a shot? :) > You said it was a compile time thingy... not a post KDE install > whatchamacallit... > I don't care to invest the time in it... either. Not with the 100000 > other things I have on my open source plate at the moment. That's true. :) It's a tradeoff though.. I'm trying to accomodate users here, not developers... that's KDE's goal. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111271410.fAREA1908496>